A Review of studies on Alternative Assessment in EFL Language Learning

Introductionevaluating writing. He suggested a design for authentic
These days, there has been an increasing interest inwriting assessment that can be crucial to teaching and
the use of assessment procedures that aretesting writing skill. He believed that an authentic writing
completely different from conventional methods ofassessment should reveal various types of writing as
assessment. More reliable forms of assessment, suchwell as levels of difficulty related to the task. For
as portfolios, interviews, journals, project works, andexample, a writing assessment assignment can be:
self- or peer- assessment have become more and 
more common in the second and foreign language* totally open-ended, where the student is asked to
classrooms.construct an essay either requiring or not requiring
These alternative forms of testing or assessment arecertain background knowledge
more student-centered as they involve students in their* limited to specific components of the writing process,
learning, so that they can control their own languagesuch as planning, outlining, or even revising
learning. Furthermore, these kinds of* used for short answers which may be either a part
assessment--called alternative assessment--can helpof planning or an abbreviated check for a basic
teachers to get enough information for developing theirunderstanding of key points
instructional plans and practices. Table below canYap (1993) reported the results of a research project
indicate the obvious differences which exist betweeninvolving thirty-five adult basic (ABE) and English as a
the traditional and alternative forms of assessmentsecond language (ESL) programs. Writing assessment,
(Richards & Renandya, 2002).portfolio assessment, and classroom assessment
 were shown to be suitable approaches to the type of
Old formsauthentic assessment called for within the profession.
New formsPierce, Swain, and Hart (1993) reported on a study of
1. Focus on language500 eighth-grade students, signifying that
1. Focus on communicationself-assessment was an applicable and reliable
2. Teacher-centeredmeasure of language proficiency. Pavis (1988)
2. Learner-centeredindicated similar results for college students learning
3. Isolated skillsFrench based on a journal writing project in which
3. Integrated skillsstudents checked their own learning and recognized
4. Emphasis on productproblems encountered as well as achievements over
4. Emphasis on processthe course of the term. Allwright (1988) has argued
5. One answer, one-way correctnessthat the quality of learning can improve by controlling
5. Open-ended, multiple solutionswhat happens in the mind of the learner. Based on
6. Tests that teststudies such as these, alternative assessment that
6. Tests that teachinvolves the learner in self-assessment is
 recommended, regardless of possible claims of
The aim of the present paper is to review somesubjectivity as a negative factor in their use.
studies which have conducted on examining theseHancock (1994) believed that one of the advantages
new forms of assessment, and express their findingsof alternative assessment is that it gives enough
and their researchers' beliefs about the usefulness ofopportunities for the learners to discover that they can
these kinds of testing in EFL/ESL classrooms.complete the tasks successfully. He said those
Review of the related literaturelanguage programs that focus on alternative
Before 1990's our testing and assessment wereassessment are apt to help the learners to evaluate
based on behaviorist views of cognition andwhat they learn both in and outside of the language
improvement, but after 1990's it was suggested thatclass in a real life situation.
some alternative ways of testing are needed toOne of the alternative ways of assessment which is
evaluate a person's performance (Hancock, 1994).used as alternative to norm-referenced tests as Elliott
Studies have revealed that innovative individuals do not(1995) said is performance assessment. Teachers can
have unique mental sections, but they use what theyuse performance assessment to get a much richer
have in more well-organized and flexible ways. Suchand more comprehensive picture of what students
individuals are enormously thoughtful about theirknow and can do.
activities, their use of time, and the quality of theirAs defined by the U.S. Congress, Office of
products (Gardner, 1993). Thus, a need for a newTechnology Assessment (OTA) (1992, as cited by
assessment process was needed to test the learners.Elliot, 1995), performance assessments are those
Alternative assessment includes a variety of"testing methods that require students to create an
instruments that can be modified in varying situations.answer or product that demonstrates their knowledge
According to the literature (e.g. Anthony, Johnson,and skills" which can have different forms, such as
Mikelson, & Peerce, 1991; Goodman, 1991; Holt;conducting experiments, writing extended essay, and
1994), these instruments include, for example, the usedoing mathematical computations.
of checklists of student behavior, products, journals,Performance assessment is a continuum of
reading logs, videos of role plays, audio tapes ofassessment formats ranging from the simplest
discussion, self-evaluation questionnaires, workstudent-constructed answers to comprehensive
samples, and teacher observations or anecdotalexpressions or collections of work over time. By
records.choosing good assessment tasks, sharing the scoring
In her article on alternative assessment, Huerta-Maciascriteria with students, motivating students to do the
(1995) claimed that although traditional forms oftasks, and understand their performances, teachers
assessment can provide somehow suitable measurescan direct instruction to its appropriate destination with
of students' performance, they often fail to giveperformance assessment.
information about what the students can do in theirAlthough performance assessment is very useful for
second language. Because of this, a new method ofboth teachers and students it has some
assessment has been suggested in recent yearsdisadvantages in terms of the concept of fairness.
which is called alternative assessment, authenticAlthough consistency to assure fairness in
assessment, or informal assessment. The focus of thisperformance assessment increases the ease of
new method is on assessing learners' ability to useadministration it decreases the task's meaningfulness
language holistically in real-life situations and is usuallyand creates some biases.
carried out constantly over a period of time. 
As Miriam and Fran (1995) said in their article aboutConclusion
ESL learners' assessment, assessment is difficult forAlthough alternative assessment procedures are less
adult ESL educators. Finding a means that canformal than traditional testing and have valuable
measure learner achievements and program successwashback effects according to the literature, they
to institutions, display improvement in English proficiencyhave some drawbacks which make them difficult to
and literacy skills to learners, and clarify for thebe used. Using these kinds of procedures is very time
educators themselves what has been learned andconsuming for both learners and teachers. The cultural
what has not is not an easy task. Dissatisfaction withfactors and educational backgrounds of the learners
accessible tools has been widespread, and manymay result in some problems in use of this
teachers can not find some methods to evaluateassessment. Moreover, it is hard to measure the
learner gains in a way that helps teaching and learning.outcomes without using some standardized test.
Today, it seems that using a combination of availableOwing to these issues, ESL programs often use a
and program- developed alternative assessmentcombination of commercially available and
instruments can be helpful for assessment.program-developed assessment instruments to
Alternative assessment is a flexible way to gatherevaluate literacy and language proficiency.
enough information about learners and evaluate what 
has been taught in class. "Learner portfolios,"--References
collections of individual work-- are common examplesAlderson, J. C. and Banerjee, J. (2001). Language
of alternative assessment. Portfolios can include suchtesting and assessment (Part 1).
items as reports on books read, notes from learnerLanguage Teaching, 34 (4), 213-236.
teacher interviews, learners' reflections on theirAllright, R. (1988). Autonomy and individuation in whole
progress, writing samples, data fromclass instruction. In Brooks, A. & Gundy, P. (Eds),
performance-based assessments, and scores onIndividuation and autonomy in language learning (pp.
commercially available tests (Fingeret, 1993; Wrigley,35-44), British council.
1992).Anthony, R., Johnson, T., Mickelson, N., & Peerce,
Grosvenor (1993: 14-15) defined portfolio as a list ofA. (1991). Evaluating literacy: A perspective for change.
three basics models as follows:Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
1- Showcase model, consisting of work samplesChapman, C. (1990). Authentic writing assessment.
chosen by the student.ERIC Digest (ERIC Document Reproduction Service
2-Descriptive model, consisting of representative workED328606).
of the student, with no attempt atevaluation.DeFina, A. A. (1992). Portfolio assessment:Getting
3- Evaluative model, consisting of representativestarted. New York: Scholastic Professional Books.
products that have been evaluated by criteria.Elliot, S. N. (1995). Creating Meaningful Performance
DeFina (1992: 13-16) listed the following assumptionsAssessments. ERIC Digest E531(ERIC Document
about portfolio assessment:Reproduction Service No. ED381985).
- "Portfolios are systematic, purposeful, and meaningfulFingeret, H.A. (1993). It belongs to me: A guide to
collections of students' works in one or more subjectportfolio assessment in adult education programs.
areas.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. (Eric
- Students of any age or grade level can learn notDocument Reproduction Service No. ED 359 352)
only to select pieces to be placed into their portfoliosGardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligence: The theory in
but can also learn to establish criteria for theirpractice. New York: Basic Books.
selections.Goodman, Y. M. (1991). Informal methods of evaluation.
- Portfolio collections may include input by teachers,In J. Flood, J. M. Jensen, Lapp, D. & J. Squire (Eds),
parents, peers, and school administrators.Handbook of research on teaching the English
- In all cases, portfolios should reflect the actuallanguage arts (pp. 502-509). New York: Macmillan
day-to-day learning activities of students.Grosvenor, L. (1993). Taking assessment matters into
- Portfolios should be ongoing so that they show theour own hands. In M. Dalheim (Ed.), Student portfolios
students' efforts, progress, and achievements over a(NEA Professional Library Teacher-to-Teacher Series).
period of time.Washington DC: Bookshelf (Editorial Projects in
- Portfolios may contain several compartments, orEducation).
subfolders.Hancock, C. R. (1994). Alternative Assessment and
- Selected works in portfolios may be in a variety ofSecond Language Study: What and Why? (Office of
media and may be multidimensional."Educational Research and Improvement Rep. No.
Polaksowski (1993) has talked about the benefits ofRR93002010). U.S. Dept. of Education.
the portfolio, and has said that portfolios are a strikingHolt D. (1994). Assessing success in family literacy
alternative to more traditional assessment approachesprojects: Alternative approaches to assessment and
for teaching children. He enumerated the benefits ofevaluation. Washington, DC: Center for Applied
portfolio as follows:Linguistics.
1- It complements such developmentally appropriateHuerta-Marcias, A. (1995). Alternative assessment :
curriculum and instruction as wholelanguage, hands-onResponses to commonly asked questions. TESOL
approaches, and process mathematics.Journal, 5(1), 8-11.
2- It also allows them to assess children's individualMiriam, B. & Fran, K. (1995). Adult ESL learner
learning styles.assessment: Purposes and tools. ERIC Digest (ERIC
3- It enhances their ability to communicate with parentsDocument Reproduction Service No. ED386962).
about children's learning.Pat, N. (1993). Alternative Assessment: Implications for
4- It helps to fulfill professional requirements of schoolSocial Studies. ERIC Digest (ERIC Document
and community accountability.Reproduction Service No ED360219).
In his article about alternative assessment and socialPavis, J. (1988). Le Carnet De Bord (the ship's Log). Le
studies, Pat (1993) stated that assessment should beFrancais dans le Monde, 218, 54-57.
separated from instruction. Student evaluation is mostPiece, B. N., Swain, M., & Hart, D. (1993).
authentic and reasonable when it is based upon theSelf-assessmen in two French immersion programs.
ideas, processes, and products. The criteria ofApplied Linguistics, 14, 25-42.
judgment and the expected results should bePolakowski, C. (1993). Literacy portfolios in the early
determined for the students clearly at first. Both thechildhood classroom. In M. Dalheim (Ed.), Student
teacher and student are responsible for each student'sportfolios (National Education Association Professional
success. Thus, the social studies classroom becomesLibrary Teacher-to-Teacher Series). Washington DC:
a model of the real world in which social and publicBookshelf (Editorial Projects in Education).
responsibility and participation is an ongoing process,Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (Eds. ) (2002).
uninterrupted by time-outs for the strangeness ofMethodology in language teaching: An anthology of
formal testing.current practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University
In an article on authentic assessment and writingPress.
assessment, Chapman (1990) suggested that due toWrigley, H.S. (1992). Learner assessment in adult ESL
the role of writing in people's academic, social, andliteracy. ERIC Digest. Washington, DC: National
personal lives, the improvement of students' ability toClearinghouse for ESL Literacy Education. (Eric
write is a main concern in every society. SinceDocument Reproduction Service No. ED 353 863)
educators can use writing to assess students'Yap, K.O. (1993). Integrating assessment with instruction
higher-order thinking skills--such as the ability to makein ABE/ESL programs. Paper presented at the annual
reasonable connections, to compare and contrastmeeting of the American Educational Research
solutions to problems, and to sufficiently supportAssociation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service
arguments and conclusions--authentic assessmentNo.
seems to provide excellent criteria for teaching and