A Reflection on Developmentally Appropriate Practice

Developmentally Appropriate Practice (DAP) has been1993). What is valued and viewed as normal in one
seen by many as the cornerstone of Early Childhoodculture may not be reflected in any other culture.
education since the National Association for theTherefore educators need to develop broad and
Education of Young Children (NAEYC) published themeaningful understandings of their students' cultural
guidelines in 1987. The guidelines have been usedbackgrounds, goals for socialisation, beliefs about the
widely in educare settings such as preschool andnature of the child and various child rearing techniques
schools, with many educators accepting DAP as best(Nissani, 1993). These beliefs about children and how
practice for educating young children. Whilst DAP hasthey develop may differ from culture to culture.
been an highly successful approach for someTeachers may need to establish wide networks and
educators, other alternative approaches to educatingmeaningful relationships with families and members of
young children have recently been identified. Also,the community so they can develop sensitivity and
many criticisms of the DAP guidelines as they wereunderstandings of their students' culture. By developing
originally written have been published. Two alternativethese understandings and working closely with
discourses to Developmentally Appropriate Practicecommunity, educators are able to prepare a more
will be considered in this paper. These alternativeeffective and appropriate educational program.
discourses include an academic approach to earlyImplementing a curriculum which addresses the cultural
childhood education and the identified cultural bias ofheritage of children will certainly be more
Developmentally Appropriate Practice.developmentally appropriate than using curriculum
NAEYC's Position Statement (1987) suggests thatguidelines which are culturally exclusive and reflective
children learn most effectively through a concrete, playof monocultural norms. It has been stated that DAP as
oriented approach to early childhood education (p36). Acurricula knowledge base failed to acknowledge
child-oriented, play based program should address themultiple perspectives, tacit knowledge, subjective
physical, social, emotional and cognitive needs of theknowing and personal cultural involvement in making
children enrolled in the program. This type of programmeaning, thereby reflecting a particular cultural
has been recognised by many as best practice in theworldview (Jipson, 1993, p128). It is important that
education of young children. In practice, this may meancurriculum is developed using many sources including
that children spend much of their day engaged inrelevant child development knowledge, individual
active, meaningful play with toys, their peers, craftcharacteristics of children, subject knowledge, the
materials, blocks, paints, adults, outdoor equipment,values of the culture, parents' desires and the
books and other useful equipment. Play can be seenknowledge children need to function competently in
as beneficial in terms of children's learning as itsociety (NAEYC, 1994, p23).
challenges them to create, collaborate, problem solve,Educational programs aim to teach children the skills
predict, reflect and enhances their ability tonecessary to function as an active citizen within
communicate (Education Queensland, 2003).society. The skills, knowledge, beliefs and attitudes
Alternatively, there are educational programs for youngtaught should reflect those that children experience
children consisting of direct instruction that do not viewwithin their home and community life. It is believed that
play as a valid form of learning. These programs focuschildren's learning is enhanced when they perceive a
primarily on academic achievement (Spodek, Saracho,connectedness between home and school and when
& Davis, 1987, p178). Academic programs maywhat is valued in one system in honoured in the other
focus on skill and drills, learning of basic isolated facts(Kostelnik Soderman & Whiren 1993, p48). DAP
and completing worksheets. Kessler (1992, p21)guidelines (NAEYC 1987) as they were originally
suggested that the increasingly academic nature ofpublished ignored the cultural impact on learning and did
early childhood programs is due to their inclusion withinlittle to emphasize the importance of strengthened
school campuses. Academic programs are teachinghome-school-community links. DAP emphasised
children the concepts and skills that were previouslyautonomy and focuses on the individual which may be
taught in the first year of formal schooling. Play is oftenin direct conflict with the ethos of other cultures, which
used within these programs as a form of relaxationmay emphasise family groups and community over
after the children have completed their set work,individuals. According to Jipson critics have identified
rather than as valuable and meaningful learningmajor problems with trying to establish universality in
experiences.child development theories to cultures which do not
Elkind states that children learn best through directshare the same worldviews, languages or social
encounters with their world rather than through formalorientations (1993, p128). Jipson goes on to state that
education involving the inculcation of symbolic rulesby redefining the interests of the child in terms of the
(1986, p1). These symbolic rules may include writing andtraditions and expectations of his/her culture and by
number systems, which are extensively taught as partreconnecting the experiences of the child to the
of academic programs. The children enrolled in thesecontext in which he/she lives and the cultural patterns
programs may have little opportunity to constructand values which she/he experiences, teachers could
knowledge or understandings for themselves. Lettersundermine the bias seemingly inherent in DAP. The
and numbers may be taught in rote like fashion, ratherconcept of DAP could be transformed to become
than construction of concepts (Kessler, 1992, p29).culturally appropriate practice (1993, p134). The issue of
Teachers within these academic contexts mayculture has had a huge impact on my practice over
provide too much highly structured formal educationthe course of my career and have used the DAP
for young children. Teaching methods can be tooguidelines with varied success.
formal and are generally considered inappropriate forI found DAP guidelines to be an effective basis for
young children (Cotton & Conklin p1). These formal,curriculum whilst working as a Preschool teacher within
content-centred teaching methods may involve a lot ofa long day child care centre. My students were all
seatwork and children will regularly engage in wholewhite middle class English first-language speakers. I did
class activities. Less time will be devoted to play duenot encounter any difficulties or feel that I was unable
to its apparent lack of educational value (Grover, 2001,to address the children's needs and interests. I was of
p1). Play based, child centred programs provide a morea similar cultural background and the program reflected
open and flexible curriculum which should be morethe children's life experiences. My experience working
suited to meeting the educational needs of youngin a remote Aboriginal community was very different. I
children.did not share these children's cultural background. Nor
The type of program that teachers implement, eitherdid I speak the same language, or share the same child
play based or academic may be impacted by manyrearing beliefs or world view. Implementing DAP as I
things including expectations of the school community.knew it proved to be ineffective and difficult, and was
Given the context of the learning environment, differentalso met with resistance from community and school
approaches to teaching and learning may bestaff, as previously discussed. My challenge was to
expected. My experiences have been impacted bydevelop some basic understandings about the
the expectations of the centre and schoolchildren's culture, day to day life, their interests and past
administration and the parents of the children enrolled intimes and world view. I also needed some information
the programs.about expectations for normal child development and
During my time as a preschool teacher working in aexpectations regarding acceptable behaviours.
long day care centre, I was expected to implement aInformation about child rearing techniques was also
child centred, play based program based on DAPvaluable. Most of the approaches, expectations and
principles. A developmentally appropriate program waspractices by the Anindilyakwa people were very
expected and encouraged by centre staff,different from mine. What I knew to be 'true' about
administration and parents. Parents were encouraginghow children develop, behave, speak and spend their
of this approach and none requested a more formal,day was not reflected within this culture. For example,
content based approach.some of the children enrolled in the preschool program
Alternatively I had a very different experience teachingwere still being breastfed through out the school day
a combined Preschool/ Transition class in a stateand their mother (or aunty or grandmother) was
school within a remote Aboriginal community. Theexpected to attend school with their child to support
school administration, staff and parents expected thattheir learning. The differences in child rearing techniques
the Early Childhood programs would be content basedand expectations about how children develop were
using formal teaching methods. A play based,vast. A curriculum based on white, middle class
developmentally appropriate program was activelymainstream norms did not address the needs, interests
resisted by the parents and they believed that theand life experiences of these children. So, I developed
children were wasting their time engaging in play baseda program which was reflective of these children's
learning experiences. Eventually I implemented a morerealities, in conjunction with parents, a local language
formal academic style program, whilst still incorporatingspecialist, departmental advisors and representatives
as many play based activities as possible. Schoolfrom the community who had education backgrounds.
learning, for this community meant children sitting atEventually a program, although based on a more
desks, completing worksheets, and learning the Englishacademic approach was developed and implemented
writing and number systems. It also involved in wholewith the help of members of the community. This
class learning. Play was seen as a reward for workingprogram was sensitive to and actively addressed the
hard on academic tasks, not as a meaningful andcultural heritage of these children.
engaging way of learning about the world.The new program demonstrated an understanding and
I found it very challenging to teach using what Iresponsiveness to the cultural and linguistic diversity of
believed to be inappropriate pedagogy for youngthe students and could be considered developmentally
children. It was my experience that an academicappropriate as identified within the revised guidelines
program may encourage children to recite rote-learned(NAEYC, 1997). The new program recognised the
facts. An academic approach failed to encourage thesignificance of family involvement and was based on a
children to become active, engaged, questioningjointly constructed, meaningful and contextually relevant
learners. It was also my experience that the inclusioncurriculum (NAEYC, 1997). The socio-cultural
of early childhood units within school campusesrelationships with the classroom had to be considered
impacted on what the school community viewed asdue to social responsibilities and avoidance
appropriate for young children. As most schools arerelationships. This type of social impact on learning was
academic in nature, one might expect similar to benot addressed in the DAP guidelines as they were
occurring in the early childhood units, howeveroriginally published. Although, social impact and cultural
inappropriate this may be.sensitivity are highlighted in the revised document.
The curriculum that I was encouraged to implementIt was my experience that there are stark differences
was very similar to that of a Year One class. Thisin the expectations child develop, between those which
was challenging in itself as most of these children hadform the basis of DAP and that of the Anindilyakwa
no spoken English and were of a spoken tradition. Thepeople. Many Anindilyakwa children were dependant
first years of schooling were used to maximise theupon their mother or female carer for emotional
children's English language acquisition and to learnsupport and nurturing. Mothers, grandmothers and
expected school behaviours. Parents judged myaunties regularly attended school with their children.
effectiveness as a teacher by how well the childrenYet, the children also were afforded a lot of freedom
were able to recite basic number facts or the alphabetand were encouraged to make many choices for
for example, rather than if the children had developedthemselves. Many behaviours were accepted as long
pre-reading skills and basic mathematicalas everyone was happy. This approach to child
understandings. These children were encouraged to berearing and development differs from that of the
quiet, passive learners, usually engaged in whole classdominant Western culture, which was reflected in the
or table work, not actively engaged in meaningfuloriginal DAP guidelines. The program that was
play-based learning experiences. Another challenge inimplemented reflected culturally specific expectations
implementing a quality program which met the needsabout how the children would develop and behave.
of the children was related to the cultural bias inherentThese understandings were developed through forging
of the NAEYC's original guidelines.relationships with members of the school community,
Developmentally Appropriate Practice was promotedwhich included parents, and community elders. It is
by many universities and teacher education coursesthough meaningful connections with the wider
as best practice for educating young children. It wascommunity that teachers are able to develop
assumed by many that it would meet the needs of alleducational programs that address the interests,
children within most educare contexts. This was notculture, language, emotional social, and physical needs
the case as the child development theories whichof the children they teach. The revised
underpin DAP were based on white middle classDevelopmentally Appropriate Practice guidelines do
males and therefore have a cultural bias (Jispon, 1993).much to highlight the need for educators to be
Due to this cultural bias, DAP may not meet the needssensitive and mindful of the cultural impact on children's
of all children, particularly those who do not share thelearning. Also, that a child-centred, play based approach
monocultural values reflected in the guidelines. Goffinto educating young children appears to be the most
states that traditional reliance on white middle classsuccessful and still represents best-practice. An
norms should be re-examined in light of the culturalacademic approach to educating young children
diversity of the children who participate in earlyperhaps meet the needs of parents and school
childhood programs (1994, p195). Recent research hasadministrators, but does not represent the best
shown that developmental milestones andapproach to educating young children.
expectations vary from culture to culture (Nissani,